Archive for the ‘PPI Claims’ Category

Posted on 24 November 2009

Claim Back PPI from Magic Loans

Over recent years Magic Loans have arranged personal loans for thousands of people in the UK. In many cases Magic Loans also arranged Payment Protection Insurance or PPI to be attached to the loans that they arranged for their customers. We understand that Magic Loans are no longer trading but that is not a bar to claiming back a PPI refund.

Miss-Sold PPI By Magic Loans?

We are acting for many clients who have claimed that they have been mis-sold PPI policies and redress has been offered as compensation. Hutcheon Solicitors have been helping customers and former customers of Magic Loans who feel they have been wrongfully sold a PPI policy. Indeed, Hutcheon Solicitors have been able to win back thousands of pounds worth of PPI money paid into policies that in reality would never actually pay out if a claim was to be made by the customer.

How Do I Know If I Can Claim Against Magic Loans?

It is quite easy for us to determine whether you have a valid PPI claim against Magic Loans. The starting point is simply to fill out our quick assessment form and a member of our assessment team will contact you at a time convenient to you to chat to you about the PPI claims process against Magic Loans. As a specialist firm of Solicitors regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, we are able to properly represent our clients and reclaim monies owed to them as quickly as possible. As a law firm we also have a duty to ensure that we obtain the maximum amount of PPI compensation from organisations such as Magic Loans and we work hard for our clients at all times.

Start Your Magic Loans PPI Claim Today

Why delay? Hutcheon Solicitors are here to start fighting for you and to win back any miss-sold PPI monies you have paid in respect of a questionable PPI policy sold to you by Magic Loans. Either Click Here to complete our quick PPI Claim Assessment Form or call us now on 01928 288211 and chat with a team member who will be happy to help you.

We have taken on a number of claims against Magic Loans in respect of mis-selling Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) which has been added on to a loan. Our clients are claiming the following:-

Return/Refund of the Cost of the PPI Policy
There are many claims for a refund or return of the PPI policy paid to Magic Loans and to cancel the policy.

Loan to be Re-Written
To reflect the fact that the PPI policy should never have been added to the loan in the first place, that the loan should be re-written to remove the cost of the loan and to write-off all interest payments.

Loan to be Written Off
On loans taken out prior to April 2007, there is a possibility that if the PPI was not optional, the entire loan together with the PPI and all interest could be written-off and refunded.

CLAIM NOW
If you think you have a claim take our 1 minute test by clicking on the link below.
Magic Loans PPI Claim Form Click Here
We operate a NO WIN NO FEE policy so you have nothing to lose to refund your PPI.

If you answer Yes to one or more of the following questions you may have a claim for PPI refund –

§ Magic Loans failed to ask me about any pre-existing medical conditions when I took out a PPI policy

§ Magic Loans failed to ask if I was or was shortly due to become self-employed when I took out the PPI policy

§ Magic Loans failed to ask if I was retired or very close to retirement ages when I took out the PPI policy

§ Magic Loans failed to ask if I was not employed (including student) when I took out the PPI policy

§ Magic Loans failed to ask if I was a public services employee when I took out the PPI policy

§ Magic Loans failed to ask if I had other protection policies in place when I took out this loan

§ Magic Loans failed to advise me that  I did not need the PPI policy as I could have repaid the loan/outstanding balance using my savings

§ Magic Loans failed told me that the PPI policy was compulsory and not optional

§ Magic Loans failed to ask if I was not aware that the PPI policy was optional

§ Magic Loans failed advise me that I would get a better interest rate or the PPI would cost much less if I took the PPI policy out with another insurer

§ Magic Loans did not make me aware of the cost of the premiums on the PPI policy

§ Magic Loans did not make me aware that the PPI policy cost would be added to the loan and I would pay interest on the cost

§ Magic Loans did not make me aware that I had taken out the PPI policy when I took out the loan

§ Magic Loans did not make me aware that I could purchase alternative PPI policies with other providers when I took out the loan

§ Magic Loans did not make me aware that the PPI policy did not cover the life of the loan

Posted on 24 November 2009

Claim Back PPI from Picture Loans

Over recent years Picture Loans have arranged personal loans for thousands of people in the UK. In many cases Picture Loans also arranged Payment Protection Insurance or PPI to be attached to the loans that they arranged for their customers.

Miss-Sold PPI By Picture Loans?

We are acting for many clients who have claimed that they have been mis-sold PPI policies and redress have been offered as compensation. Hutcheon Solicitors have been helping customers and former customers of Picture Loans who feel they have been wrongfully sold a PPI policy. Indeed, Hutcheon Solicitors have been able to win back thousands of pounds worth of PPI money paid into policies that in reality would never actually pay out if a claim was to be made by the customer.

How Do I Know If I Can Claim Against Picture Loans?

It is quite easy for us to determine whether you have a valid PPI claim against Picture Loans. The starting point is simply to fill out our quick assessment form and a member of our assessment team will contact you at a time convenient to you to chat to you about the PPI claims process against Picture Loans. As a specialist firm of Solicitors regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, we are able to properly represent our clients and reclaim monies owed to them as quickly as possible. As a law firm we also have a duty to ensure that we obtain the maximum amount of PPI compensation from organisations such as Picture Loans and we work hard for our clients at all times.

Start Your Picture Loans PPI Claim Today

Why delay? Hutcheon Solicitors are here to start fighting for you and to win back any miss-sold PPI monies you have paid in respect of a questionable PPI policy sold to you by Picture Loans. Either Click Here to complete our quick PPI Claim Assessment Form or call us now on 01928 288211 and chat with a team member who will be happy to help you.

We have taken on a number of claims against Picture Loans in respect of mis-selling Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) which has been added on to a loan. Our clients are claiming the following:-

Return/Refund of the Cost of the PPI Policy
There are many claims for a refund or return of the PPI policy paid to Picuture Loans and to cancel the policy.

Loan to be Re-Written
To reflect the fact that the PPI policy should never have been added to the loan in the first place, that the loan should be re-written to remove the cost of the loan and to write-off all interest payments.

Loan to be Written Off
On loans taken out prior to April 2007, there is a possibility that if the PPI was not optional, the entire loan together with the PPI and all interest could be written-off and refunded.

CLAIM NOW
If you think you have a claim take our 1 minute test by clicking on the link below.
Picture Loans PPI Claim Form Click Here
We operate a NO WIN NO FEE policy so you have nothing to lose to refund your PPI.

If you answer Yes to one or more of the following questions you may have a claim for PPI refund –

•    Picture Loans failed to ask me about any pre-existing medical conditions when I took out a PPI policy
•    Picture Loans failed to ask if I was or was shortly due to become self-employed when I took out the PPI policy
•    Picture Loans failed to ask if I was retired or very close to retirement ages when I took out the PPI policy
•    Picture Loans failed to ask if I was not employed (including student) when I took out the PPI policy
•    Picture Loans failed to ask if I was a public services employee when I took out the PPI policy
•    Picture Loans failed to ask if I had other protection policies in place when I took out this loan
•    Picture Loans failed to advise me that  I did not need the PPI policy as I could have repaid the loan/outstanding balance using my savings
•    Picture Loans failed told me that the PPI policy was compulsory and not optional
•    Picture Loans failed to ask if I was not aware that the PPI policy was optional
•    Picture Loans failed advise me that I would get a better interest rate or the PPI would cost much less if I took the PPI policy out with another insurer
•    Picture Loans did not make me aware of the cost of the premiums on the PPI policy
•    Picture Loans did not make me aware that the PPI policy cost would be added to the loan and I would pay interest on the cost
•    Picture Loans did not make me aware that I had taken out the PPI policy when I took out the loan
•    Picture Loans did not make me aware that I could purchase alternative PPI policies with other providers when I took out the loan
•    Picture Loans did not make me aware that the PPI policy did not cover the life of the loan

Posted on 30 May 2009

We have taken on a number of claims against Natwest Bank in respect of mis-selling Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) which has been added on to a loan. Our clients are claiming the following:-

Return/Refund of the Cost of the PPI Policy

There are many claims for a refund or return of the PPI policy paid to Black Horse and to cancel the policy.

Loan to be Re-Written

To reflect the fact that the PPI policy should never have been added to the loan in the first place, that the loan should be re-written to remove the cost of the loan and to write-off all interest payments.

Loan to be Written Off

On loans taken out prior to April 2007, there is a possibility that if the PPI was not optional, the entire loan together with the PPI and all interest could be written-off and refunded.

CLAIM NOW

If you think you have a claim take our 1 minute test by clicking on the link below.

Natwest Bank PPI Claim Form Click Here

We operate a NO WIN NO FEE policy so you have nothing to lose to refund your PPI.

 

If you answer Yes to one or more of the following questions you may have a claim for PPI refund -

  • Natwest failed to ask me about any pre-existing medical conditions when I took out a PPI policy
  • Natwest failed to ask if I was or was shortly due to become self-employed when I took out the PPI policy
  • Natwest failed to ask if I was retired or very close to retirement ages when I took out the PPI policy
  • Natwest failed to ask if I was not employed (including student) when I took out the PPI policy
  • Natwest failed to ask if I was a public services employee when I took out the PPI policy
  • Natwest failed to ask if I had other protection policies in place when I took out this loan
  • Natwest failed to advise me that  I did not need the PPI policy as I could have repaid the loan/outstanding balance using my savings
  • Natwest failed told me that the PPI policy was compulsory and not optional
  • Natwest failed to ask if I was not aware that the PPI policy was optional
  • Natwest failed advise me that I would get a better interest rate or the PPI would cost much less if I took the PPI policy out with another insurer
  • Natwest did not make me aware of the cost of the premiums on the PPI policy
  • Natwest did not make me aware that the PPI policy cost would be added to the loan and I would pay interest on the cost
  • Natwest did not make me aware that I had taken out the PPI policy when I took out the loan
  • Natwest did not make me aware that I could purchase alternative PPI policies with other providers when I took out the loan
  • Natwest did not make me aware that the PPI policy did not cover the life of the loan

Natwest Bank PPI Claim Form Click Here

 

Further Guidance

For more information on how to make a claim click here.
For more information about mortgage repossessions click here.

R James Hutcheon Solicitors
The Heath Business & Technology Park
Runcorn
Cheshire
WA7 4QX

Visit our main Web site www.hutcheonlaw.co.uk

This Firm is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

 

PPI Claim Refunds

There are a number of claims against Natwest Bank along with other major and respected lending institutions who are alleged to have been mis-sold PPI policies linked to a loan.

PPI is usually a “secondary purchase” to a loan or mortgage borrowers are taken by surprise when confronted with a PPI advice and just go along with the sale that they must or ought to have PPI to protect them.  The borrower is not given time to think about alternative methods of protection or whether they really do need the PPI policy.  The PPI sold along side a loan or mortgage are often single premiums added to the loan amount which is expensive to the borrower as it means that the borrower is paying interest on the cost of the PPI premium over the full term of the loan.  PPI premiums are often loaded with commission payments making the cost of the policy even more expensive, with small print exclusions and cancellation penalties thousands of PPI policies have been mis-sold.  We are making PPI refund claims against Natwest Bank along with other major lenders on behalf of our clients as in all the circumstances it was not considered that Natwest Bank treated their own customers fairly.  If refunds are not made we will always consider taking court action if appropriate to ensure our clients are not financially prejudiced by the sale of the PPI.  Natwest Bank often respond to us by saying that the PPI has not been mis-sold.  These claims are being considered very carefully and court action may be pursued where there is a denial.

A review of PPI mis-selling has been considered by the Financial Services Authority “FSA” which does not make good reading to the industry as a whole.  Many respected Banks and lenders have been fined due to the fact that they do not have appropriate systems and controls in place to ensure that their customers are treated fairly.  With large commissions and bonuses paid on the sale of the PPI policies lenders often fail to monitor whether the PPI policy has been mis-sold.  It is the borrower who pays at the end of the day either through the monthly repayments towards the loan or mortgage or when a claim is rejected against the PPI policy.  The Competition Commission has also investigated the sale of PPI policies.  For further reading please click here.

Obviously not every PPI policy has been mis-sold and indeed if sold correctly would offer valuable protection.  Every case must be individually considered on its merits.  Each case is “fact sensitive” which means that as PPI refund claims solicitors we will be reliant upon what our client has said in evidence about how the PPI policy was sold in order for us to consider making a PPI refund claim.  With documentary evidence in support and on occasions, the telephone recording of the sale, will provide us with a complete picture on how the PPI policy was sold.  Obviously if the lender has been fined by the FSA this will help support a refund of the PPI policy. 

When an event such as redundancy, loss of a job, illness or accident occurs the borrower only then finds out that the PPI policy is worthless due to exclusion clauses such as a failure to declare pre-existing medical conditions.   Whilst the Financial Industry is now cleaning up its act there are still the historic PPI policies that have been sold which are costing many borrowers substantial sums for something at the end of the day are bits of worthless paper.

We are often asked what can be reclaimed or refund against the likes of Natwest Bank and other lenders.  The starting point in law is that the borrower must be put back into the same financial position as if the PPI was never sold.  This means the return of all PPI payments made to lenders such as Natwest Bank plus interest on the payments made. In addition the remaining PPI cost plus interest be waived and the loan re-written so that the future payments under the loan or mortgage reflect the reduced costs.  In more severe cases where PPI was sold as a “compulsory purchase” or that the borrower had “no choice” but to take out the PPI policy alongside the loan there is also a chance that the loan itself can be written off.  This is due to the Consumer Credit Laws which protect borrowers if there has been a breach of minimum requirement criteria.

Court Action – Defending Customers

In addition to taking action for refunds of PPI policies we are also acting for clients who have been taken to court by their Banks because they have fallen behind with their monthly repayments.  In some cases we are defending repossession proceedings taken by lenders where a borrower has lost their job or was unable to claim a refund against the PPI policy due to a pre-existing medical conditions.

Mortgage Repossessions

We are able to offer support and ongoing advice in these types of claims all on a “NO WIN NO FEE” basis where there has been a mis-sold PPI policy linked to a mortgage or secured loan.  Access to justice and legal representation should be a right and not a privilege.  Unfortunately in many cases of this nature the borrower is unable to afford to appoint a solicitor to defend and counter claim.  As solicitors we understand the stress and strain of repossession proceedings and the build of debt.  But since the law has changed making it possible for specialist solicitors like R James Hutcheon to act for free it is now possible to instruct us without fear of getting into any more debt.

Expert legal advice on repossession claims where PPI has been sold along side the mortgage or secured loan can mean not only obtaining a full refund of all PPI but it could mean that the entire loan could no longer be valid if the PPI was mis-sold and breached the prescribed terms of the Consumer Credit Act.  A complete defence could be made out.  The advice is not to suffer in silence and contact R James Hutcheon solicitors on a NO WIN NO FEE basis.  There is nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Visit our main Web site www.hutcheonlaw.co.uk

We are taking on claims against all the main high street banks lenders for mis-selling PPI claim and refunds including Alliance & Leicester, Bank of Scotland, Barclays Bank, BlackHorse Finance, Halifax, HSBC Bank, Egg, First Plus, Lloyds Bank, Natwest Bank, Picture Loans, Natwest Bank to name but a few.

Mortgage or Second Charges?

Payment Protection Insurance is commonly sold as part of obtaining a mortgage. The lender often wants to protect themselves in case the borrower is unable to meet the repayments due to some unfortunate event.  But again there has been widespread mis-selling of PPI linked to a mortgage or second charge so the borrower has no protection under the PPI policy and may face possession proceedings.

The added burden of the cost of the PPI policy on top of mortgage or a second charge often means that the repayments cost much more than initially thought. This is a large burden and often contributes to the borrowers failing to keep up their repayments.

Just like any single premium PPI policy added to a loan, a PPI policy added to a mortgage or second charge can also be refunded and claimed back if it was mis-sold.

 

Posted on 30 May 2009

We have taken on a number of claims against Royal Bank of Scotland in respect of mis-selling Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) which has been added on to a loan. Our clients are claiming the following:-

Return/Refund of the Cost of the PPI Policy

There are many claims for a refund or return of the PPI policy paid to Black Horse and to cancel the policy.

Loan to be Re-Written

To reflect the fact that the PPI policy should never have been added to the loan in the first place, that the loan should be re-written to remove the cost of the loan and to write-off all interest payments.

Loan to be Written Off

On loans taken out prior to April 2007, there is a possibility that if the PPI was not optional, the entire loan together with the PPI and all interest could be written-off and refunded.

CLAIM NOW

If you think you have a claim take our 1 minute test by clicking on the link below.

Royal Bank of Scotland PPI Claim Form Click Here

We operate a NO WIN NO FEE policy so you have nothing to lose to refund your PPI.

If you answer Yes to one or more of the following questions you may have a claim for PPI refund -

  • RBS failed to ask me about any pre-existing medical conditions when I took out a PPI policy
  • RBS failed to ask if I was or was shortly due to become self-employed when I took out the PPI policy
  • RBS failed to ask if I was retired or very close to retirement ages when I took out the PPI policy
  • RBS failed to ask if I was not employed (including student) when I took out the PPI policy
  • RBS failed to ask if I was a public services employee when I took out the PPI policy
  • RBS failed to ask if I had other protection policies in place when I took out this loan
  • RBS failed to advise me that  I did not need the PPI policy as I could have repaid the loan/outstanding balance using my savings
  • RBS failed told me that the PPI policy was compulsory and not optional
  • RBS failed to ask if I was not aware that the PPI policy was optional
  • RBS failed advise me that I would get a better interest rate or the PPI would cost much less if I took the PPI policy out with another insurer
  • RBS did not make me aware of the cost of the premiums on the PPI policy
  • RBS did not make me aware that the PPI policy cost would be added to the loan and I would pay interest on the cost
  • RBS did not make me aware that I had taken out the PPI policy when I took out the loan
  • RBS did not make me aware that I could purchase alternative PPI policies with other providers when I took out the loan
  • RBS did not make me aware that the PPI policy did not cover the life of the loan

Royal Bank of Scotland PPI Claim Form Click Here

Further Guidance

For more information on how to make a claim click here.
For more information about mortgage repossessions click here.

R James Hutcheon Solicitors
The Heath Business & Technology Park
Runcorn
Cheshire
WA7 4QX

Visit our main Web site www.hutcheonlaw.co.uk

This Firm is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

PPI Claim Refunds

There are a number of claims against Royal Bank of Scotland along with other major and respected lending institutions who are alleged to have been mis-sold PPI policies linked to a loan.

PPI is usually a “secondary purchase” to a loan or mortgage borrowers are taken by surprise when confronted with a PPI advice and just go along with the sale that they must or ought to have PPI to protect them.  The borrower is not given time to think about alternative methods of protection or whether they really do need the PPI policy.  The PPI sold along side a loan or mortgage are often single premiums added to the loan amount which is expensive to the borrower as it means that the borrower is paying interest on the cost of the PPI premium over the full term of the loan.  PPI premiums are often loaded with commission payments making the cost of the policy even more expensive, with small print exclusions and cancellation penalties thousands of PPI policies have been mis-sold.  We are making PPI refund claims against Royal Bank of Scotland along with other major lenders on behalf of our clients as in all the circumstances it was not considered that Royal Bank of Scotland treated their own customers fairly.  If refunds are not made we will always consider taking court action if appropriate to ensure our clients are not financially prejudiced by the sale of the PPI.  Royal Bank of Scotland often respond to us by saying that the PPI has not been mis-sold.  These claims are being considered very carefully and court action may be pursued where there is a denial.

A review of PPI mis-selling has been considered by the Financial Services Authority “FSA” which does not make good reading to the industry as a whole.  Many respected Banks and lenders have been fined due to the fact that they do not have appropriate systems and controls in place to ensure that their customers are treated fairly.  With large commissions and bonuses paid on the sale of the PPI policies lenders often fail to monitor whether the PPI policy has been mis-sold.  It is the borrower who pays at the end of the day either through the monthly repayments towards the loan or mortgage or when a claim is rejected against the PPI policy.  The Competition Commission has also investigaged the sale of PPI policies.  For further reading please click here.

Obviously not every PPI policy has been mis-sold and indeed if sold correctly would offer valuable protection.  Every case must be individually considered on its merits.  Each case is “fact sensitive” which means that as PPI redund claims solicitors we will be reliant upon what our client has said in evidence about how the PPI policy was sold in order for us to consider making a PPI refund claim.  With documentary evidence in support and on occasions, the telephone recording of the sale, will provide us with a complete picture on how the PPI policy was sold.  Obviously if the lender has been fined by the FSA this will help support a refund of the PPI policy.

When an event such as redundancy, loss of a job, illness or accident occurs the borrower only then finds out that the PPI policy is worthless due to exclusion clauses such as a failure to declare pre-existing medical conditions.   Whilst the Financial Industry is now cleaning up its act there are still the historic PPI policies that have been sold which are costing many borrowers substantial sums for something at the end of the day are bits of worthless paper.

We are often asked what can be reclaimed or refund against the likes of Royal Bank of Scotland and other lenders.  The starting point in law is that the borrower must be put back into the same financial position as if the PPI was never sold.  This means the return of all PPI payments made to lenders such as Royal Bank of Scotland plus interest on the payments made. In addition the remaining PPI cost plus interest be waived and the loan re-written so that the future payments under the loan or mortgage reflect the reduced costs.  In more severe cases where PPI was sold as a “compulsory purchase” or that the borrower had “no choice” but to take out the PPI policy alongside the loan there is also a chance that the loan itself can be written off.  This is due to the Consumer Credit Laws which protect borrowers if there has been a breach of minimum requirement criteria.

Court Action – Defending Customers

In addition to taking action for refunds of PPI policies we are also acting for clients who have been taken to court by their Banks because they have fallen behind with their monthly repayments.  In some cases we are defending repossession proceedings taken by lenders where a borrower has lost their job or was unable to claim a refund against the PPI policy due to a pre-existing medical conditions.

Mortgage Repossessions

We are able to offer support and ongoing advice in these types of claims all on a “NO WIN NO FEE” basis where there has been a mis-sold PPI policy linked to a mortgage or secured loan.  Access to justice and legal representation should be a right and not a privilege.  Unfortunately in many cases of this nature the borrower is unable to afford to appoint a solicitor to defend and counter claim.  As solicitors we understand the stress and strain of repossession proceedings and the build of debt.  But since the law has changed making it possible for specialist solicitors like R James Hutcheon to act for free it is now possible to instruct us without fear of getting into any more debt.

Expert legal advice on repossession claims where PPI has been sold along side the mortgage or secured loan can mean not only obtaining a full refund of all PPI but it could mean that the entire loan could no longer be valid if the PPI was mis-sold and breached the prescribed terms of the Consumer Credit Act.  A complete defence could be made out.  The advice is not to suffer in silence and contact R James Hutcheon solicitors on a NO WIN NO FEE basis.  There is nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Visit our main Web site www.hutcheonlaw.co.uk

We are taking on claims against all the main high street banks lenders for mis-selling PPI claim and refunds including Alliance & Leicester, Bank of Scotland, Barclays Bank, BlackHorse Finance, Halifax, HSBC Bank, Egg, First Plus, Lloyds Bank, Natwest Bank, Picture Loans, Royal Bank of Scotland to name but a few.

Mortgage or Second Charges?

Payment Protection Insurance is commonly sold as part of obtaining a mortgage. The lender often wants to protect themselves in case the borrower is unable to meet the repayments due to some unfortunate event.  But again there has been widespread mis-selling of PPI

Accident at work compensation claims click here

No Win No Fee

Child injury compensation claims click here

Posted on 29 May 2009

PPI Claim Refunds

We have received a number of claims against HSBC along with other major and respected lending institutions who are alleged to have been mis-sold PPI policies linked to a loan. As PPI is usually a “secondary purchase” to a loan or mortgage borrowers are taken by surprise when confronted with a PPI advice and just go along with the sale that they must or ought to have PPI to protect them.  The borrower is not given time to think about alternative methods of protection or whether they really do need the PPI policy.

The PPI sold along side a loan or mortgage are often single premiums added to the loan amount which is expensive to the borrower as it means that the borrower is paying interest on the cost of the PPI premium over the full term of the loan.  PPI premiums are often loaded with commission payments making the cost of the policy even more expensive, with small print exclusions and cancellation penalties thousands of PPI policies have been mis-sold.  We are making PPI refund claims against HSBC along with other major lenders on behalf of our clients as in all the circumstances it was not considered that HSBC treated their own customers fairly.  If refunds are not made we will always consider taking court action if appropriate to ensure our clients are not financially prejudiced by the sale of the PPI.  HSBC often respond to us by saying that the PPI has not been mis-sold.  These claims are being considered very carefully and court action may be pursued where there is a denial.

A general review of PPI mis-selling has been considered by the Financial Services Authority “FSA” which does not make good reading to the industry as a whole.  Many respected Banks and lenders have been fined due to the fact that they do not have appropriate systems and controls in place to ensure that their customers are treated fairly.  With large commissions and bonuses paid on the sale of the PPI policies lenders often fail to monitor whether the PPI policy has been mis-sold.  It is the borrower who pays at the end of the day either through the monthly repayments towards the loan or mortgage or when a claim is rejected against the PPI policy.  The Competition Commission has also investigaged the sale of PPI policies.  For further reading please click here.

Obviously not every PPI policy has been mis-sold and indeed if sold correctly would offer valuable protection.  Every case must be individually considered on its merits.  Each case is “fact sensitive” which means that as PPI redund claims solicitors we will be reliant upon what our client has said in evidence about how the PPI policy was sold in order for us to consider making a PPI refund claim.  With documentary evidence in support and on occasions, the telephone recording of the sale, will provide us with a complete picture on how the PPI policy was sold.  Obviously if the lender has been fined by the FSA this will help support a refund of the PPI policy.

When an event such as redundancy, loss of a job, illness or accident occurs the borrower only then finds out that the PPI policy is worthless due to exclusion clauses such as a failure to declare pre-existing medical conditions.   Whilst the Financial Industry is now cleaning up its act there are still the historic PPI policies that have been sold which are costing many borrowers substantial sums for something at the end of the day are bits of worthless paper.

We are often asked what can be reclaimed or refund against the likes of HSBC and other lenders.  The starting point in law is that the borrower must be put back into the same financial position as if the PPI was never sold.  This means the return of all PPI payments made to lenders such as HSBC plus interest on the payments made. In addition the remaining PPI cost plus interest be waived and the loan re-written so that the future payments under the loan or mortgage reflect the reduced costs.  In more severe cases where PPI was sold as a “compulsory purchase” or that the borrower had “no choice” but to take out the PPI policy alongside the loan there is also a chance that the loan itself can be written off.  This is due to the Consumer Credit Laws which protect borrowers if there has been a breach of minimum requirement criteria.

If you answer Yes to one or more of the following questions you may have a claim for PPI refund -

  • HSBC failed to ask me about any pre-existing medical conditions when I took out a PPI policy
  • HSBC failed to ask if I was or was shortly due to become self-employed when I took out the PPI policy
  • HSBC failed to ask if I was retired or very close to retirement ages when I took out the PPI policy
  • HSBC failed to ask if I was not employed (including student) when I took out the PPI policy
  • HSBC failed to ask if I was a public services employee when I took out the PPI policy
  • HSBC failed to ask if I had other protection policies in place when I took out this loan
  • HSBC failed to advise me that  I did not need the PPI policy as I could have repaid the loan/outstanding balance using my savings
  • HSBC failed told me that the PPI policy was compulsory and not optional
  • HSBC failed to ask if I was not aware that the PPI policy was optional
  • HSBC failed advise me that I would get a better interest rate or the PPI would cost much less if I took the PPI policy out with another insurer
  • HSBC did not make me aware of the cost of the premiums on the PPI policy
  • HSBC did not make me aware that the PPI policy cost would be added to the loan and I would pay interest on the cost
  • HSBC did not make me aware that I had taken out the PPI policy when I took out the loan
  • HSBC did not make me aware that I could purchase alternative PPI policies with other providers when I took out the loan
  • HSBC did not make me aware that the PPI policy did not cover the life of the loan

To Make a PPI Refund Claim Click Here Now

Further Guidance
For more information on how to make a claim click here.
For more information about mortgage repossessions click here.

R James Hutcheon Solicitors
The Heath Business & Technology Park
Runcorn
Cheshire
WA7 4QX
This Firm is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

Court Action – Defending Customers

Posted on 27 May 2009

Black Horse Finance Ltd

We have taken on a number of claims against Black Horse Finance in respect of mis-selling Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) which has been added on to a loan. Our clients are claiming the following:-

Return/Refund of the Cost of the PPI Policy

There are many claims for a refund or return of the PPI policy paid to Black Horse and to cancel the policy.

Loan to be Re-Written

To reflect the fact that the PPI policy should never have been added to the loan in the first place, that the loan should be re-written to remove the cost of the loan and to write-off all interest payments.

Loan to be Written Off

On loans taken out prior to April 2007, there is a possibility that if the PPI was not optional, the entire loan together with the PPI and all interest could be written-off and refunded.

CLAIM NOW

If you think you have a claim take our 1 minute test by clicking on the link below.

Black Horse PPI Claim Form Click Here

We operate a NO WIN NO FEE policy so you have nothing to lose to refund your PPI.

 

If you answer Yes to one or more of the following questions you may have a claim for PPI refund -

  • Blackhorse failed to ask me about any pre-existing medical conditions when I took out a PPI policy
  • Blackhorse failed to ask if I was or was shortly due to become self-employed when I took out the PPI policy
  • Blackhorse failed to ask if I was retired or very close to retirement ages when I took out the PPI policy
  • Blackhorse failed to ask if I was not employed (including student) when I took out the PPI policy
  • Blackhorse failed to ask if I was a public services employee when I took out the PPI policy
  • Blackhorse failed to ask if I had other protection policies in place when I took out this loan
  • Blackhorse failed to advise me that  I did not need the PPI policy as I could have repaid the loan/outstanding balance using my savings
  • Blackhorse failed told me that the PPI policy was compulsory and not optional
  • Blackhorse failed to ask if I was not aware that the PPI policy was optional
  • Blackhorse failed advise me that I would get a better interest rate or the PPI would cost much less if I took the PPI policy out with another insurer
  • Blackhorse did not make me aware of the cost of the premiums on the PPI policy
  • Blackhorse did not make me aware that the PPI policy cost would be added to the loan and I would pay interest on the cost
  • Blackhorse did not make me aware that I had taken out the PPI policy when I took out the loan
  • Blackhorse did not make me aware that I could purchase alternative PPI policies with other providers when I took out the loan
  • Blackhorse did not make me aware that the PPI policy did not cover the life of the loan

Black Horse PPI Claim Form Click Here

 

Mortgage or Second Charges?

Payment Protection Insurance is commonly sold as part of obtaining a mortgage. The lender often wants to protect themselves in case the borrower is unable to meet the repayments due to some unfortunate event.  But again there has been widespread mis-selling of PPI linked to a mortgage or second charge so the borrower has no protection under the PPI policy and may face possession proceedings.

The added burden of the cost of the PPI policy on top of mortgage or a second charge often means that the repayments cost much more than initially thought. This is a large burden and often contributes to the borrowers failing to keep up their repayments.

Just like any single premium PPI policy added to a loan, a PPI policy added to a mortgage or second charge can also be refunded and claimed back if it was mis-sold.

Further Guidance

For more information on how to make a claim click here.
For more information about mortgage repossessions click here.

R James Hutcheon Solicitors
The Heath Business & Technology Park
Runcorn
Cheshire
WA7 4QX

Visit our main Web site www.hutcheonlaw.co.uk

This Firm is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

 

PPI Claim Refunds

There are a number of claims against Black Horse Finance along with other major and respected lending institutions who are alleged to have been mis-sold PPI policies linked to a loan.

PPI is usually a “secondary purchase” to a loan or mortgage borrowers are taken by surprise when confronted with a PPI advice and just go along with the sale that they must or ought to have PPI to protect them.  The borrower is not given time to think about alternative methods of protection or whether they really do need the PPI policy.  The PPI sold along side a loan or mortgage are often single premiums added to the loan amount which is expensive to the borrower as it means that the borrower is paying interest on the cost of the PPI premium over the full term of the loan.  PPI premiums are often loaded with commission payments making the cost of the policy even more expensive, with small print exclusions and cancellation penalties thousands of PPI policies have been mis-sold.  We are making PPI refund claims against Black Horse Finance along with other major lenders on behalf of our clients as in all the circumstances it was not considered that Black Horse Finance treated their own customers fairly.  If refunds are not made we will always consider taking court action if appropriate to ensure our clients are not financially prejudiced by the sale of the PPI.  Black Horse Finance often respond to us by saying that the PPI has not been mis-sold.  These claims are being considered very carefully and court action may be pursued where there is a denial.

A review of PPI mis-selling has been considered by the Financial Services Authority “FSA” which does not make good reading to the industry as a whole.  Many respected Banks and lenders have been fined due to the fact that they do not have appropriate systems and controls in place to ensure that their customers are treated fairly.  With large commissions and bonuses paid on the sale of the PPI policies lenders often fail to monitor whether the PPI policy has been mis-sold.  It is the borrower who pays at the end of the day either through the monthly repayments towards the loan or mortgage or when a claim is rejected against the PPI policy.  The Competition Commission has also investigaged the sale of PPI policies.  For further reading please click here.

Obviously not every PPI policy has been mis-sold and indeed if sold correctly would offer valuable protection.  Every case must be individually considered on its merits.  Each case is “fact sensitive” which means that as PPI redund claims solicitors we will be reliant upon what our client has said in evidence about how the PPI policy was sold in order for us to consider making a PPI refund claim.  With documentary evidence in support and on occasions, the telephone recording of the sale, will provide us with a complete picture on how the PPI policy was sold.  Obviously if the lender has been fined by the FSA this will help support a refund of the PPI policy. 

When an event such as redundancy, loss of a job, illness or accident occurs the borrower only then finds out that the PPI policy is worthless due to exclusion clauses such as a failure to declare pre-existing medical conditions.   Whilst the Financial Industry is now cleaning up its act there are still the historic PPI policies that have been sold which are costing many borrowers substantial sums for something at the end of the day are bits of worthless paper.

We are often asked what can be reclaimed or refund against the likes of Black Horse Finance and other lenders.  The starting point in law is that the borrower must be put back into the same financial position as if the PPI was never sold.  This means the return of all PPI payments made to lenders such as Black Horse Finance plus interest on the payments made. In addition the remaining PPI cost plus interest be waived and the loan re-written so that the future payments under the loan or mortgage reflect the reduced costs.  In more severe cases where PPI was sold as a “compulsory purchase” or that the borrower had “no choice” but to take out the PPI policy alongside the loan there is also a chance that the loan itself can be written off.  This is due to the Consumer Credit Laws which protect borrowers if there has been a breach of minimum requirement criteria.

Court Action – Defending Customers

In addition to taking action for refunds of PPI policies we are also acting for clients who have been taken to court by their Banks because they have fallen behind with their monthly repayments.  In some cases we are defending repossession proceedings taken by lenders where a borrower has lost their job or was unable to claim a refund against the PPI policy due to a pre-existing medical conditions.

Mortgage Repossessions

We are able to offer support and ongoing advice in these types of claims all on a “NO WIN NO FEE” basis where there has been a mis-sold PPI policy linked to a mortgage or secured loan.  Access to justice and legal representation should be a right and not a privilege.  Unfortunately in many cases of this nature the borrower is unable to afford to appoint a solicitor to defend and counter claim.  As solicitors we understand the stress and strain of repossession proceedings and the build of debt.  But since the law has changed making it possible for specialist solicitors like R James Hutcheon to act for free it is now possible to instruct us without fear of getting into any more debt.

Expert legal advice on repossession claims where PPI has been sold along side the mortgage or secured loan can mean not only obtaining a full refund of all PPI but it could mean that the entire loan could no longer be valid if the PPI was mis-sold and breached the prescribed terms of the Consumer Credit Act.  A complete defence could be made out.  The advice is not to suffer in silence and contact R James Hutcheon solicitors on a NO WIN NO FEE basis.  There is nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Visit our main Web site www.hutcheonlaw.co.uk

We are taking on claims against all the main high street banks lenders for mis-selling PPI claim and refunds including Alliance & Leicester, Bank of Scotland, Barclays Bank, BlackHorse Finance, Halifax, HSBC Bank, Egg, First Plus, Lloyds Bank, Natwest Bank, Picture Loans, Royal Bank of Scotland to name but a few.

Posted on 27 May 2009

Top 6 PPI Mis-Selling PPI Claims

We have listed below the most common complaints by our clients against lenders for the mis-selling of PPI policies:

1. Pressurised Sales

The sales advisor tells the borrower that without the PPI they are unlikely to obtain the loan due to their credit history or something else which may go against them if they do not take out the PPI. This type of pressurised sale is one of the most common techniques used. It must be remembered that PPI policies should be optional.

2. Assumptive Sales

Our clients experience are such that the PPI was on an “assumptive sale” that is, the PPI sold by the lender “assumed” that the borrowers wanted PPI rather whether it was suitable for them. To sell any PPI policy the lender must investigate whether the borrower really does need the PPI policy and establish any existing cover through insurance or employment.

3. Failure to Ask About Pre-Existing Medical Conditions

All PPI policies contain small print that exclude pre-existing medical conditions. The sales advisor often fails to investigate and ask the right questions to ensure that the borrower would be eligible for the PPI. Any pre-existing condition would bar any claim and make the PPI worthless.

4. Failure to Establish Existing PPI or Cover

Often the sales advisor does not ask the right questions on whether the borrower has any exiting PPI or existing similar cover which could be available through other insurance policies the borrower may have or through his/her employment. For instance the employer’s contract may pay the borrower his/her wages in full or in part for 6 months if they are off work due to illness. Should this be the case a careful analysis has to be considered to see if the PPI is suitable.

5. Did not Know About PPI

In a fair proportion of cases the sales advisor did not even tell the borrower about the PPI. The PPI cost was simply added to the loan without any knowledge. Should this be the case we will assume that the PPI was compulsory and therefore there is a chance that the loan could be written-off as well as a full refund of the PPI premiums paid.

6. Re-Selling PPI on Second Loans

There are other cases where our clients have been contacted by lenders to sell them a second loan. The second loan was then used to pay of the first loan (including the PPI) and then they have been sold PPI again. The PPI policy is “re-sold” or “churned” which in such circumstances are not fair to the borrower. The cost of the PPI in all loans sold in this way can be reclaimed or refunded and in certain cases have both loans written off in full.

CLAIM NOW

If you think you have a claim take our 1 minute test by clicking on the link below.

On line Self Assessment Form - Click Here

We operate a NO WIN NO FEE policy so you have nothing to lose to refund your PPI.

R James Hutcheon Solicitors
The Heath Business & Technology Park
Runcorn
Cheshire
WA7 4QX
View Larger Map

This Firm is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

Visit our main Web site www.hutcheonlaw.co.uk

 

 

Posted on 27 May 2009

Egg Banking plc

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Egg Banking plc £721,000 for serious failings in its sales of credit card payment protection insurance (PPI).

The FSA found failings in approximately 40 per cent of telephone sales of credit card PPI made by Egg between January 2005 and December 2007. Egg sold PPI either when receiving a customer services call, or when making a sales call to a new customer. When Egg customers said they did not want PPI on their credit cards, the firm directed its sales staff to use techniques to persuade the customer to take the insurance - called ‘objection handling’.

These techniques included over-emphasising the positive features of the PPI, or telling the customer they could take the PPI for a free period and cancel it later if they did not want it. In some cases, even when the customer did not consent, PPI was applied to their credit card anyway.

The FSA found that:

“Egg used inappropriate sales techniques to try to persuade customers to buy payment protection insurance on their credit card even when they asserted they did not want the cover. All firms must ensure that customers are treated fairly when selling PPI and if a customer does not want PPI, they should not be pressured into taking it.… Egg stopped telephone sales of credit card PPI in December 2007, and has agreed to write to customers and pay a full refund plus interest where appropriate. Egg is likely to pay substantial compensation as a result of this exercise.”

For more information see the FSA Web site: more information please.

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2008/149.shtml

CLAIM NOW

If you answer Yes to one or more of the following questions you may have a claim for PPI refund -

  • Egg failed to ask me about any pre-existing medical conditions when I took out a PPI policy
  • Egg failed to ask if I was or was shortly due to become self-employed when I took out the PPI policy
  • Egg failed to ask if I was retired or very close to retirement ages when I took out the PPI policy
  • Egg failed to ask if I was not employed (including student) when I took out the PPI policy
  • Egg failed to ask if I was a public services employee when I took out the PPI policy
  • Egg failed to ask if I had other protection policies in place when I took out this loan
  • Egg failed to advise me that  I did not need the PPI policy as I could have repaid the loan/outstanding balance using my savings
  • Egg failed told me that the PPI policy was compulsory and not optional
  • Egg failed to ask if I was not aware that the PPI policy was optional
  • Egg failed advise me that I would get a better interest rate or the PPI would cost much less if I took the PPI policy out with another insurer
  • Egg did not make me aware of the cost of the premiums on the PPI policy
  • Egg did not make me aware that the PPI policy cost would be added to the loan and I would pay interest on the cost
  • Egg did not make me aware that I had taken out the PPI policy when I took out the loan
  • Egg did not make me aware that I could purchase alternative PPI policies with other providers when I took out the loan
  • Egg did not make me aware that the PPI policy did not cover the life of the loan

If you think you have a claim take our 1 minute test by clicking on the link below.

On line Self Assessment Form - Click Here

We operate a NO WIN NO FEE policy so you have nothing to lose to refund your PPI.

R James Hutcheon Solicitors
The Heath Business & Technology Park
Runcorn
Cheshire
WA7 4QX
View Larger Map

Accident at work compensation claims click here

No Win No Fee

Child injury compensation claims click here

Posted on 27 May 2009

Regency Mortgage Corporation

The Financial Services Authority fined Regency Mortgage Corporation Limited (Regency) £56,000 for failures relating to its sale of mortgage related Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) in the sub prime market. It is the first time the FSA has taken action against a firm for sales of PPI since the regulation of general insurance started in January 2005.

The FSA said that “Regency did not treat its customers fairly and failed to organise and control its business effectively. In particular, Regency did not collect sufficient information during a PPI sale to ensure its recommendations met customers’ demands and needs. In a number of cases customers were sold a policy for which they already had cover or were sold a policy under parts of which they were unable to claim. In addition, both Regency’s procedures for compliance and record keeping were inadequate and senior management did not receive sufficient information to identify risks in PPI sales.

Regency’s breaches were particularly serious because as a specialist in the “Right to Buy” market, its customer base consists primarily of sub-prime customers who traditionally have limited financial means and access to credit. The risks for these customers are therefore high if they are not eligible to claim on a recommended PPI policy or if the policy is not suitable for their demands and needs.”

For more information on Regency Loans see the FSA’s web site:

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2006/088.shtml

CLAIM NOW

If you answer Yes to one or more of the following questions you may have a claim for PPI refund -

  • Regency Mortgage failed to ask me about any pre-existing medical conditions when I took out a PPI policy
  • Regency Mortgage failed to ask if I was or was shortly due to become self-employed when I took out the PPI policy
  • Regency Mortgage failed to ask if I was retired or very close to retirement ages when I took out the PPI policy
  • Regency Mortgage failed to ask if I was not employed (including student) when I took out the PPI policy
  • Regency Mortgage failed to ask if I was a public services employee when I took out the PPI policy
  • Regency Mortgage failed to ask if I had other protection policies in place when I took out this loan
  • Regency Mortgage failed to advise me that  I did not need the PPI policy as I could have repaid the loan/outstanding balance using my savings
  • Regency Mortgage failed told me that the PPI policy was compulsory and not optional
  • Regency Mortgage failed to ask if I was not aware that the PPI policy was optional
  • Regency Mortgage failed advise me that I would get a better interest rate or the PPI would cost much less if I took the PPI policy out with another insurer
  • Regency Mortgage did not make me aware of the cost of the premiums on the PPI policy
  • Regency Mortgage did not make me aware that the PPI policy cost would be added to the loan and I would pay interest on the cost
  • Regency Mortgage did not make me aware that I had taken out the PPI policy when I took out the loan
  • Regency Mortgage did not make me aware that I could purchase alternative PPI policies with other providers when I took out the loan
  • Regency Mortgage did not make me aware that the PPI policy did not cover the life of the loan

If you think you have a claim take our 1 minute test by clicking on the link below.

Quick PPI Assessment Form - Click Here

We operate a NO WIN NO FEE policy so you have nothing to lose to refund your PPI.

R James Hutcheon Solicitors
The Heath Business & Technology Park
Runcorn
Cheshire
WA7 4QX
View Larger Map

This Firm is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

Posted on 27 May 2009

Redcats (Brands) Limited

The Financial Services Authority FSA fined Redcats (Brands) Limited £270,000 on 20.12.06 for failing to treat its customers fairly when selling Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) in connection with home shopping products. The regulator found that Redcats did not have adequate systems and controls in place to minimise the risk of unsuitable sales.

The FSA also found weaknesses in the way that Redcats operated and maintained its compliance systems, training and competence arrangements and sales processes.

The FSA have stated on their web site that Redcats breaches were particularly serious because they meant that over an 18-month period approximately 160,100 customers were sold PPI which might not have been suitable for their individual needs.

For more information by the FSA see the following link

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2006/088.shtml

CLAIM NOW

If you answer Yes to one or more of the following questions you may have a claim for PPI refund -

  • Redcats failed to ask me about any pre-existing medical conditions when I took out a PPI policy
  • Redcats failed to ask if I was or was shortly due to become self-employed when I took out the PPI policy
  • Redcats failed to ask if I was retired or very close to retirement ages when I took out the PPI policy
  • Redcats failed to ask if I was not employed (including student) when I took out the PPI policy
  • Redcats failed to ask if I was a public services employee when I took out the PPI policy
  • Redcats failed to ask if I had other protection policies in place when I took out this loan
  • Redcats failed to advise me that  I did not need the PPI policy as I could have repaid the loan/outstanding balance using my savings
  • Redcats failed told me that the PPI policy was compulsory and not optional
  • Redcats failed to ask if I was not aware that the PPI policy was optional
  • Redcats failed advise me that I would get a better interest rate or the PPI would cost much less if I took the PPI policy out with another insurer
  • Redcats did not make me aware of the cost of the premiums on the PPI policy
  • Redcats did not make me aware that the PPI policy cost would be added to the loan and I would pay interest on the cost
  • Redcats did not make me aware that I had taken out the PPI policy when I took out the loan
  • Redcats did not make me aware that I could purchase alternative PPI policies with other providers when I took out the loan
  • Redcats did not make me aware that the PPI policy did not cover the life of the loan

If you think you have a claim take our 1 minute test by clicking on the link below.

PPI Quick Assessment Form - Click Here

We operate a NO WIN NO FEE policy so you have nothing to lose to refund your PPI.

R James Hutcheon Solicitors
The Heath Business & Technology Park
Runcorn
Cheshire
WA7 4QX
View Larger Map

This Firm is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority

Payment Protection Claims Website by
PPI Claims and Refunds - This firm is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority
Accident At Work Compensation Claims Solicitors LED Mood Lights and Mood Lighting Site Map